Equality (or "why doesn't everyone get to do stuff in church?")
If we really believe that everyone is equal, then what huge effect would that have on the way we are and do "church"?
Talked a little about equality at the Lab last weekend, and this was the main question that hit me from the point of view of someone who has the privilege of leading and shaping our church community.
It would be silly to try and convince ourselves that every has the same level of skill and ability in every area - sure some people are better at speaking and some at playing instruments and some at making orange squash, but what if we really decided that everyone's contribution was of equal importance? How different would church look to the way it is now?
Rather than a worship gathering which is lead by and organised by a small number of people and presented to the masses, what if we could find a way where the whole church could contribute to our time spent worshipping together? Surely, that's what Paul is really getting at when he says "everyone has a hymn, or a word of instruction, a revelation, a tongue or an interpretation."
If he was speaking to the church today, wouldn't he be telling us to produce worship times where the goal is for as many to contribute as possible in as many ways?
The old idea that if everyone was at the front then there would be in the congregation doesn't seem to wash - it misses the point. And you could argue that some people are called to the behind-the-scenes stuff - and technical stuff and cleaning and squash-making is important - but when Paul says hymns, instruction and revelation isn't he talking about the up-front stuff?
What does that kind of worship gathering look like?
Are we too far gone in the modern church to achieve it? Or does it just not apply anymore?
(written to The Album Leaf, which may explain the slightly depressing tone ;-)
Also syndicated on Anglimergent - a network of Anglicans across the world engaging the emerging church and mission. To join in the discussion there click here.





